On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Johannes Waldmann wrote: > If this seems impossible, then the function itself probably *is* > complex, and its type would give valuable information, > and I don't see what a programmer (or a reader) benefits > from a language that allows to omit this information. >
For one, because that makes it possible to load it into an interpreter and be told the type. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] A problem that's all in your head is still a problem. Brain damage is but one form of mind damage. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
