John Hughes wrote:
An example where loss of sharing leads to exponential time:
fib n = fst (fib' n)
fib' :: (Num a, Num b) => Integer -> (a,b)
fib' 0 = (0,1)
fib' n = (snd p,fst p+snd p)
where
p :: (Num a, Num b) => (a,b)
p = fib' (n-1)
It would be undesirable for adding a type signature to a function (such
as fib'
above) to risk making its performance exponentially worse, because of
consequential loss of sharing in a binding somewhere else. Wouldn't it?
I don't agree in this case. You are asking for something rather strange
when you put that type signature on fib'. I also noticed that to give
a "convincing" example you picked something with polyporphic recursion.
P-R wasn't in Haskell at the time the M-R was added (if memory serves
me). So there must be other examples.
I still think removing the M-R and issuing a warning when there's a
potential loss of sharing would be acceptable.
-- Lennart
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
