John Meacham wrote:

The proposed solution was to add NaN, +Infinity, and -Infinity to
rational with the representations 0 :% 0, 1 :% 0, and -1 :% 0
respectively. Seems straightforward, (and generally useful) but we
should make sure not to forget it for haskell-prime.

I'm not necessarily against this, but it does fundamentally change the semantics of Ratio. Has all the behaviour been worked out for this?

--
Ashley Yakeley

_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to