I updated the ForeignBlocking wiki page with what I believe is the current state of this proposal; see
didn't I mention that "concurrent" may be inappropriate and misleading, and that I think it is bad practice to rely on the programmer annotating the dangerous cases, instead of the safe cases?
wouldn't the safe approach be to assume that the foreign call may do anything, unless the programmer explicitly tells you about what things it won't do (thus taking responsibility).
cheers, claus
http://haskell.galois.com/cgi-bin/haskell-prime/trac.cgi/wiki/ForeignBlocking
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
