On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:13:00AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > - the default should be... concurrent reentrant, presumably, because > that is the safest. (so we need to invert the notation).
I think the name "concurrent" has a similar problem to "safe": it reads as an instruction to the implementation, rather than a declaration by the programmer of the properties of a particular function; as Wolfgang put it, "this function might spend a lot of time in foreign lands". _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime