On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:10:36PM -0700, Iavor Diatchki wrote: > > > I understand the reduction steps. Are you saying that the problem is > > > that the two sets are not syntactically equal? To me this does not > > > seem important: we just end up with two different ways to say the same > > > thing (i.e., they are logically equivalent). > > > > If c were mentioned in another constraint, they would not be equivalent. > > How so? A concrete example would really be useful. I think that the > constraint 'C [a] b d' and 'C [a] c d' are equivalent and I don't see > how the rest of the context can affect this (of course I have been > wrong in the past :-).
They are equivalent, but C [a] b d, Num c and C [a] c d, Num c are not. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
