Ross Paterson wrote:
Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Maybe monads quit on failure and continue on success. We want the opposite semantics for guards, pattern matching, and the like.
And that's what mplus does.
In particular, your identity... is not true...
Oops, yes it is, sorry. You are using mplus as the "dual" of (<<) rather than dualiing the monad. -Yitz _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
