On 2007 Feb 2, at 5:46 AM, Malcolm Wallace indited:
Since yours is the first actual flame I can remember ever being posted
to any Haskell list, I think this counts as the beginning of the
end of
civilisation as we know it. :-) At least, the beginning of the
end of
civilised discussion. And couldn't you guess - over lexical
syntax! :-)
Guess that means civilisation is as fragile as the syntax, eh? :-)
-- from: http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/syntax-iso.html#sectB.4
impspec -> ( import1 , ... , importn [ , ] ) (n>=0)
| hiding ( import1 , ... , importn [ , ] ) (n>=0)
exports -> ( export1 , ... , exportn [ , ] ) (n>=0)
stmts -> stmt1 ... stmtn exp [ ; ] (n>=0)
stmt -> exp ;
| pat <- exp ;
| let decls ;
| ; (empty statement)
...
What would be the proper way to propose that:
| ( exp1 , ... , expk ) (tuple, k>=2)
| [ exp1 , ... , expk ] (list, k>=1)
be amended to:
| ( exp1 , ... , expk [ , ] ) (tuple, k>=2)
| [ exp1 , ... , expk [ , ] ] (list, k>=1)
--D'gou
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
