Hello Simon,

Wednesday, April 23, 2008, 3:21:18 AM, you wrote:

> I'm hoping someone will supply some.  There seemed to be strong opinion
> on #haskell that this change should be made, but it might just have been
> a very vocal minority.

i think this is some misinterpretation. haskell-prime should be,
afaik, simple standardization of current software practices, more or
less common subset of ghc/hugs language extensions. in particular, it
should keep almost full bwd compatibility with H98 standard. it was
haskell-2 to break up old things and build new perfect language from
ground


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to