I don't know what you want it to mean, so I can't answer that. :) I doubt anyone has ever used a VT on purpose. I know I haven't. I regard it as a lexical quirk.
-- Lennart On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Jon Fairbairn <jon.fairba...@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Lennart Augustsson <lenn...@augustsson.net> writes: > >> But VT is allowed in Haskell. > > Gosh, so it is. It's been a while since I looked, and I've > no recollection of the discussion that made it part of > whitechar. But does it mean what I want it to mean? Does > anyone actually use it? Are there any occurrences of it in > Haskell programmes that aren't mistakes? > > -- > Jón Fairbairn jon.fairba...@cl.cam.ac.uk > http://www.chaos.org.uk/~jf/Stuff-I-dont-want.html (updated 2008-04-26) > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime > _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
