I don't know what you want it to mean, so I can't answer that. :) I doubt anyone has ever used a VT on purpose. I know I haven't. I regard it as a lexical quirk.
-- Lennart On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Jon Fairbairn <[email protected]> wrote: > Lennart Augustsson <[email protected]> writes: > >> But VT is allowed in Haskell. > > Gosh, so it is. It's been a while since I looked, and I've > no recollection of the discussion that made it part of > whitechar. But does it mean what I want it to mean? Does > anyone actually use it? Are there any occurrences of it in > Haskell programmes that aren't mistakes? > > -- > Jón Fairbairn [email protected] > http://www.chaos.org.uk/~jf/Stuff-I-dont-want.html (updated 2008-04-26) > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime > _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
