On 7 Jul 2009, at 02:28, John Meacham wrote:

Haskell currently doesn't _have_ a record syntax (I think it was always a
misnomer to call it that) it has 'labeled fields'. ...

and a reworking of the standard to not refer to the current system as a
'record syntax' but rather a 'labeled fields' syntax.

I strongly agree with the latter. In fact, I was under the impression that the Report already avoided the term "record syntax" completely, but checking just now showed 6 distinct occurrences.

Regards,
    Malcolm

_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to