On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Iavor Diatchki wrote: > I thought that the intended semantics was supposed to be that the only > element is bottom (hence the proposal to add a related empty case > construct)?
If that were the case, a compiler could legitimately discard any value of such a type, because it could be easily reconstructed. I don't think that is what is intended. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
