On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:03 AM, John Meacham <[email protected]> wrote: > This isn't so much a proposal as a recommendation for terminology we use > when talking about things on the list and proposals in general. Calling > haskell's labeled field mechanism 'records' leads to all sorts of > confusion for people that come from other languages where 'records' > means something else, this is compounded by the fact there are several > actual record proposals out there that are orthogonal to labeled fields, > but calling fields 'records' confuses this issue.
Just out of curiosity, what are the attributes associated with "labeled fields" and what are the ones associated with "records"? _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
