See http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4430 for what we are proposing for Template Haskell.
S | -----Original Message----- | From: haskell-prime-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:haskell-prime-boun...@haskell.org] On | Behalf Of Lennart Augustsson | Sent: 16 November 2010 19:52 | To: Ben Millwood | Cc: haskell-prime@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Add haskell-src as an official machine-readable component of the Haskell | standard | | Please explain. Fixity information cannot be provided unless you find | all the imported modules and process those, so I'm not sure how | haskell-src-exts could do any better than it currently does. | | > | > (Examples of controversies possible in haskell-src: we have the Hs | > prefix on constructors everywhere, we can't provide fixity information | > (and the haskell-src-exts implementation of this is unsatisfactory in | > several important ways), a lot of type class instances are absent | > (even Ord!), the distribution of SrcLocs is a little awkward when | > manipulating source abstractly, and some constructors allow impossible | > values, e.g. HsLambda can contain zero patterns) | _______________________________________________ | Haskell-prime mailing list | Haskell-prime@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
