Hi Neil, Neil Mitchell wrote: > There is nothing to stop an library author doing exactly this, and it > might even be useful for some people (personally I'm going to stick to > haskell-src-exts, because it's a brilliant library).
Yes, it is. I am not proposing changing in any way how we develop and use Haskell parsers as tools. I am proposing taking an existing parser and using it in a different way. > I've found plenty of HSE/GHC parsing differences in my work, > and my suspicion is that several of them are probably also > present in haskell-src. Indeed. Easily finding and documenting such discrepancies is one of the major benefits of having a machine-readable component in the standard. > I also don't want the Haskell Prime Committee to take > on the jobs of library maintainership or implementation, > those are best kept elsewhere. Agreed. I am not proposing that. The machine-readable portion of the standard will be based on a parser library that exists quite apart from the standard. Thanks, Yitz _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
