On 6 April 2011 20:42, Colin Paul Adams <co...@colina.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>> "Bas" == Bas van Dijk <v.dijk....@gmail.com> writes: > Bas> On 6 April 2011 17:34, Colin Paul Adams <co...@colina.demon.co.uk> > wrote: > >> Allowed? Allowed for what? > Bas> Allowed to be called a Haskell file. > Well, what the report says on that is irrelevant. If I see a file > containing Haskell code, I shall call it a Haskell file, irrespective. I > suspect I will be in the majority.
It seems you have a problem with the word "allowed". What do you think of the interoperability guidelines as proposed by Duncan? They are less stringent while having the same intention as my original proposal. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
