On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Christian Siefkes <christ...@siefkes.net> wrote:
> Also, that example is not really an argument against using list functions on > strings (which, by any reasonable definition, seem to be "sequences of > characters" -- whether that sequence is represented as a list, an array, or > something else, seems more like an implementation detail to me). The correctness problems isn't that a list is used to represent a sequence. The problem is that that representational detail (and I agree with you it is an implementation of sequence) is made part of the API on strings. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime