> In the index of the pdf version of the Haskell2010 report at
> http://www.haskell.org/definition/haskell2010.pdf there is still
> mentioning of n+k patterns:
>
> page 209 first column, where it says "see also n+k patterns`' (which does
> not exist) page 305, second column under patterns
Thanks, I've fixed it in the sources, so the next revision will have those
entries removed.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
