My main concern is its a really weird corner case for the grammar to remember for tuple sections and it does have very weird grammar specification issues.
I really have no objection to it for the other cases. It'd make export lists cleaner, maybe a few other cases, but how often can you really say you can meaningfully comment out one field of a tuple have have the surrounding code make any sense? -Edward On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Bardur Arantsson <s...@scientician.net>wrote: > On 05/17/2013 06:32 PM, Johan Tibell wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Garrett Mitchener < > > garrett.mitche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Anyway, this is a "paper cut" in the language that has been bugging me > for > >> a while, and since there's now a call for suggestions for Haskell 2014, > I > >> thought I'd ask about it. > >> > > > > I've also thought about this issue and I agree with Garrett, allowing > that > > trailing comma (or semicolon) would help readability*. If it doesn't work > > with tuples, perhaps we could at least do it with lists and records? > > > > Multiline tuples don't seem all that common, so +1 on that from me. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime