On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Carter Schonwald < [email protected]> wrote:
> hrm, so youre wanting something even smarter than the MINIMAL pragma > stuff, namely > "depending on which subset of the complementary methods are defined, > define this method differently"? > I've been expecting someone to ask for that ever since MINIMAL was floated.... (In fact I more than half expected MINIMAL to vanish under a bikeshed with that as its frame.) -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
