On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Sven Panne <svenpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-10-06 18:47 GMT+02:00 Herbert Valerio Riedel <h...@gnu.org>: > >> [...] That's because -Wall-hygiene (w/o opting out of harmless) warnings >> > across multiple GHC versions is not considered a show-stopper. >> > > That's your personal POV, I'm more leaning towards "-Wall -Werror". I've > seen too many projects where neglecting warning over an extended period of > time made fixing them basically impossible at the end. Anyway, I think that > a sane ecosystem should allow *both* POVs, the sloppy one and the strict > one. > Note: You haven't been able to upload a package that has -Werror turned on in the cabal file for a couple of years now -- even if it is only turned on on the test suite, so any -Werror discipline you choose to enforce is purely local. -Edward
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
