Yes, persistent commenting / threading somehow on some tool. And I trust Herbert's judgement
On Saturday, May 7, 2016, Vitaly Bragilevsky <[email protected]> wrote: > The third one here. I think that process decisions can be made by chairman > alone without calling votes, that's organizing part of job, not conceptual > one. > > Vitaly > > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:05 PM Richard Eisenberg <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> I second this motion to call a vote or other concrete, forward-moving >> action on this topic. >> >> I, too, am refraining from commenting on other threads until this issue >> is resolved. >> >> Richard >> >> On May 6, 2016, at 12:32 PM, M Farkas-Dyck <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> > I think we ought to make a choice quite soon. Proposals are already >> > being made on this list, but i hesitate to make comment lest it be >> > forgotten when we move to our new medium. >> > >> > My opinion on our choice of medium is known, i believe. Who or what >> > makes the final call? hvr? committee member votes? >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Haskell-prime mailing list >> > [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-prime mailing list >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime >> >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
