I kinda agree, the workflow they're articulating doesn't quite line up with what we may do.
I can't speak for other folks, but I've been privately putting together / chewing on a few proposals I want to put forward. But I also want to make sure I adhere to a high bar/ think things through in what I put forward. I do think a number of prime committee members are planning to meet during Icfp. I hope to be amongst them :). Also have been busy with work :) On Wednesday, July 20, 2016, Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Having seen the new GHC process, I am not quite sure how to relate it to > Haskell'. Would someone who's thought more about this care to clarify the > mapping between the different "roles", and concretely which parts are we > thinking of doing for Haskell'? > > -Iavor >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
