Hello, I would say that this is a too complex of a change to discuss for Haskell Prime without implementation or prior experience. If you are interested in something like this, you may want to start a discussion of the design on one of the other lists, or perhaps write up a proposal for GHC.
The proposals currently under discussion are on the `github` URL. Cheers, -Iavor On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Saurabh Nanda <saurabhna...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I was going through https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Process#Proposals and > noticed the following: > > > Ideally the language change should be implemented already, so that > experience gained with the implementation can inform the discussion > > Is this a hard requirement? I would like to see the ability to pass named > arguments to functions somehow (most probably through anonymous records). > I'm unaware of any existing language extension that solves this problem. > Does this render the discussion out-of-bounds from a Haskell Prime > perspective? Has this already been proposed and considered? > > Also, going by what is given on the Wiki, I'm confused about where to > check the current status of proposals that are being considered. Which is > the primary link: > > * https://prime.haskell.org/query?status=new&status= > assigned&status=reopened&group=state > * Or, https://github.com/haskell/rfcs > > -- Saurabh. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime