So it's O(N) -> O(1) where N is a number of lines/imports. But you're right for the readiness. I'm convinced!
2017-02-02 16:52 GMT+02:00 Doug McIlroy <d...@cs.dartmouth.edu>: > > I often see a confusion between greater expresiveness (good goal) and > > having to type less (largely irrelevant goal). By all means make the > module > > system more expressive, but try to avoid "clever" things for convenience. > > To expand upon this principle a bit, syntactic sugar that promises to save > O(1) > typing in an n-line module is suspect; that which might save O(n) is more > promising. > > Doug > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
