> Nothing to do with the content of the language (Standard) Haskell per
> se, but if the next revision is going to be the final product of the
> Haskell Committee, I'd like to encourage its members to at some stage
> write something up about the decade-long design process.
The paper below contains some of the technical rationale for the
original design, but does not discuss the political/process issues.
-Paul
@article{huda89a
,author={Hudak, P.}
,title={Conception, Evolution, and Application of Functional
Programming Languages}
,journal={ACM Computing Surveys}
,volume=21
,number=3
,year=1989
,pages={359-411}
}
- Re: Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Standard Haskell David Barton
- Re: Standard Haskell Sigbjorn Finne
- Re: Standard Haskell Tony Davie
- Re: Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Standard Haskell David Barton
- Re: Standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Re: Standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Re: Standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Re: Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- Re: standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: standard Haskell Ron Wichers Schreur
- Re: standard Haskell Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- Re: standard Haskell John Hughes
- Re: standard Haskell John Hughes
- Re: standard Haskell Frank Christoph
- Standard Haskell Koen Claessen
- RE: Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
