Is the following fragment legal Haskell? Section B.3 of the report is
not clear enough in this respect (at least for me :-}
foo x = do
case x of
_ -> return '?'
If it *is* legal, GHC is wrong and Hugs is correct, otherwise GHC is
right and Hugs is too liberal and its library contains some layout
errors.
Waiting for enlightment,
Sven "Nitpick" Panne
--
Sven Panne Tel.: +49/89/2178-2235
LMU, Institut fuer Informatik FAX : +49/89/2178-2211
LFE Programmier- und Modellierungssprachen Oettingenstr. 67
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D-80538 Muenchen
http://www.pms.informatik.uni-muenchen.de/mitarbeiter/panne