Is this legal Haskell 98 Code:
module Test where
class A a where
foo :: a -> a
class (A a) => B a where
boo :: a -> a
foo a = a
GHC compiles it just fine but the latest vesion of Hugs98 gives me
ERROR "test.hs" (line 10): No member "foo" in class "B"
So I was wondering if giving default definitions for base member in a
derived class is legal is Haskell 98. If it is not legal is it a
proposed extension that Hugs will eventually support?
--
Kevin Atkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/
