Hugo Bouckaert wrote:
> I would like to know whether haskell compilers (hugs, hbc and lmlc) are
> fuly y2k compliant. Can anyone fill me in on this?
... and , if you are already here,...
could somebody explain, please, what does it mean to have a compiler
which is *NOT* y2k compliant, what is the difference between "full"
and "not full" compliance, and why should we really care.
(Please, - if I might be a little rigid - don't tell me about false
dates returned by the OS, etc. I want to know how a language compiler
may have anything to do with this Nessie...)
Jerzy Karczmarczuk
Caen, France.
June 9th, year -237 before the Really New Functional Era (*)
====
(*) At that moment our beloved Pope will finally decide that the
True Doctors might be promoted Saints, and they need not go
to Hell even if their wifes were Episcopal Church priests.
