Re: Monads in plain english (Was: Re: Licenses and Libraries)

[George Russell]

Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
[snip]
> Indeed.  But if you get this far, understanding (>>=) quite trivial
> (assuming you don't have problems with higher-order functions).
Yes, it would be quite trivial.  But why bother?  You only need (>>=)
if you want to declare your own instance of Monad, which probably doesn't
need to be in an introductory course.