Marcin Kowalczyk wrote:
> I think that composing a list by (.) from (x:)'s instead of by (:)
> from x's should be good, although I'm not sure how good comparing to
> (:)'s at the beginning of the list. It means that a list is
represented
> by the function concatenating the list to the argument. Such functions
> can be glued by function composition, also from equal big parts.
Do GHC or NHC do any optimizations of functional composition for the
case of single threaded use of functional values?
Viktor
