For comparison, see http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/~jhr/sml/basis/pages/list-pair.html I think this style of documentation is fairly useful, and it doesn't take long to see if the function you want is there. My only quibble with this format is that it separates the type of a function from its definition. Also I think it is useful to Haskell initiates (who are, however, the least important people in this discussion) to have a Haskell definition, if it fits into one line.
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation trb
- RE: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Mark P Jones
- RE: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Mark P Jones
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation George Russell
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Josef Sveningsson
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Martin Norb{ck
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Martin Norb{ck
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Andy Gill
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Lars Lundgren
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation George Russell
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation D. Tweed
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Phil Molyneux
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Josef Sveningsson
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Jon . Fairbairn
- RE: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Michael T. Richter
- RE: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Michael T. Richter
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Michael T. Richter
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Christian Sievers
- Re: Haskell Wish list: library documentation Jonathan King
