Mark Engelberg wrote: > This is a huge difference, and makes Haskell look incredibly slow by > comparison. The speed difference in this case is well worth the extra few > lines of code. > > Presumably, since I am a total newcomer to Haskell, my Haskell program is > not truly representative of how to best implement this algorithm in Haskell, > so the comaprison to C++ is probably unfair. I dont't care very much how fast a program runs. I care about how long it takes me to write it. If you take a programming task of reasonable complexity you will finish *months* earlier using a --good-- functional language instead of C++. Use a functional language and buy a faster computer with the saved money/time. juergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++
Juergen Pfitzenmaier Sat, 18 Sep 1999 00:06:37 +0200 (MET DST)
- Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Mark Engelberg
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Fergus Henderson
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Juergen Pfitzenmaier
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Adrian Hey
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Bart Demoen
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Herbert Graeber
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Fergus Henderson
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++ S.D.Mechveliani
