[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S.D.Mechveliani) wrote,

> As to me, i still agree to pay 17 times for the functionality.
> But is the test all right, what people think?
> And he compared the Haskell program with the C++ program that uses
> the  next_permutation  function.

If you don't know the implementation of next_permutation,
how can you ensure that both programs actually go through
the same sequence of permutations.  Depending on the two
algorithms involved one program may do a single permutation
to reach the goal and the other program 1000 permutations.
This has nothing to do with the programming languages
involved.

Manuel



Reply via email to