On 8 Oct, Christopher Jeris wrote:
> Personal taste in infix operators seems to be another good argument for a
> camlp4-style preprocessor for Haskell.
Please no! I want to be able to read other folks programmes and vice
versa. The whole point of suggesting a particular glyph on this foram
is so that we can swallow our personal pride and use a common language.
> For instance I would like to use
> 'o' for composition (since anybody who uses 'o' for a variable gets what
> they deserve!) but I guess that would make the lexer not so nice.
You could use `o` already. f `o` g looks no worse to me than f >.> g
et al.
--
Jón Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 Kimberley Road [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cambridge CB4 1HH +44 1223 570179 (pm only, please)
