Is not deleteBy :: (a->Bool) -> [a] -> [a]
more natural for the library than
deleteBy :: (a->a->Bool) -> a -> [a] -> [a]
?
For example, to remove the first negative from a list, people
suggest usually
deleteBy (< 0) [1,2,-1,3]
While deleteBy (>) 0 [1,2,-1,3]
needs thinking effort.
------------------
Sergey Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: deleteBy type S.D.Mechveliani
- Re: deleteBy type Jon Fairbairn
- Re: deleteBy type Hannah Schroeter
- Re: deleteBy type Mariano Suarez Alvarez
- Re: deleteBy type S.D.Mechveliani
- Re: deleteBy type Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
