Jan de Wit wrote:
> I'm under the impression that Hugs has the most features (probably because
> it's relatively easy to hack on, being an interpreter in C), GHC comes next
> after that and tends to adopt features introduced in Hugs, and NHC and HBC
> lag far behind that (no compiler wars please - each tool has its strength
> and weaknesses and its niche).
I must jump to the defense of HBC here. It had existential quantification years
before the others, and universal around the same time as GHC. It's just that
GHC/Hugs happened to pick a different syntax.
It also depends on which features you want. If you, e.g., want views than only
HBC has it.
-- Lennart
