Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:37:13 +0100, Keith Wansbrough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pisze:
> [it's no accident that class constraints `C a =>' are written the way
> they are... they are really extra arguments `CDict a ->'.]
Why are they written uncurried?
It's easier to split a curried long context among several lines,
and seems more consistent: no extra syntax of '(' ',' ')' in contexts
is necessary.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E-
^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t
QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-
