"Mike Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > imperative constructs, then build it in another language. If I can use :=, I > can make it look more like the final system, which is good for "<-" is visually intuitive and faster to type than ":=". So even in completely new (non ML/Haskell derived) language it seems preferable.
- Changing <- to := Mike Jones
- Re: Changing <- to := Thimble Smith
- RE: Changing <- to := Mike Jones
- Julian Assange