Re: Results: poll: polymorphic let bindings in do

[Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk]

6 Jun 2000 18:54:36 GMT, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:

> As I said: drop the "let" keyword inside "do", so it won't suggest
> polymorphism.
> 
> Would it be possible to have polymorphism only in bindings with
> explicit type signature?

Oops, explitit type signatures don't fit to the syntax of omitted "let" :-(

-- 
 __("<    Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
 \__/              GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E-
  ^^                  W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t
QRCZAK                  5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-