>>>>> "chris" == Chris Okasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
chris> You've struck a pet peeve of mine. These suffixes are doing namespace
chris> management, avoiding name clashes between different things that you
chris> want to call empty. But Haskell already has a perfectly good language
chris> mechanism for doing this -- the module system! Why is emptyX preferable
chris> to X.empty? The latter convention is much more flexible. It allows the
chris> user to
I completely agree with chris in this point.
Later, Juan.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
