Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:29:11 -0700, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/#derive Ahhh! Looks like it covers the case of deriving for newtypes! Does every currently derivable class fit into this? I wonder if it's able to derive Dynamic, which relies on global unsafe constants being evaluated at most once. -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/ \__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E- ^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-
- The type of zip Matt Harden
- Re: The type of zip Mark Tullsen
- Re: The type of zip Matt Harden
- Re: The type of zip Mark Tullsen
- Re: The type of zip Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: The type of zip Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: The type of zip Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: The type of zip Chris Angus
- Re: The type of zip Fergus Henderson
- Re: The type of zip Johan Jeuring
- Re: The type of zip Claus Reinke
- Re: The type of zip Matt Harden
- Re: The type of zip Lennart Augustsson
- Re: The type of zip Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: The type of zip Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: The type of zip Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: The type of zip Chris Angus