Tue, 25 Jul 2000 01:54:46 -0700, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> The current implementations predate the Haskell FFI, and so are
> more GHC-specific than they should be, a situation that we hope to
> improve, incrementally. (Any offers of help?)
There is no consensus for a higher level FFI library.
I would like to help with bringing libraries like Posix (or better
Single UNIX Specification because Posix is not freely available)
to use a "standard" FFI. But:
* I disagree with a few interface decisions, but certainly don't want
to force my view against others or unnecessarily break compatibility.
* There is no consensus for a higher level FFI library. Again I have
my own evolving proposal, but it's not something that has been
agreed to use.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E-
^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t
QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-
