> On Fri 11 Aug, Byron Hale wrote: > > Also, garbage collection is unlikely to satisfy any need > > for automatic memory management in real-time systems for the foreseeable > > future because an extra thread on a single processor is still > > non-deterministic. I don't buy this: for a long time the embedded hard realtime people refused to use CPUs with cache because they would be "non-deterministic". They finally gave up, realizing that CPU's with caches are much faster. If garbage collection is relatively cheap and makes it 10x faster to make a reliable system, they'll end up using it too. Non deterministic is not that important. Worst time is. Sengan
- GC in embedded systems (was Re: Haskell and the N... Adrian Hey
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Haskell ... Byron Hale
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Hask... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Hask... Adrian Hey
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Haskell ... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Hask... Adrian Hey
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Haskell ... Sengan
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Hask... Adrian Hey
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Haskell ... George Russell
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Hask... George Russell
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Hask... Adrian Hey
- Re: GC in embedded systems (was Re: Hask... George Russell