Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > Joe English pisze: > > According to the ISO C standard, the meaning of wchar_t > > is implementation-defined. > > I know. How to convert between the default multibyte locale and > Unicode on such systems? As far as I can tell, there's no way to do so in Standard C without investigating the details of each particular implementation. Even then it might not be possible -- I *still* can't figure out what encodings are supported on IRIX. It seems to me that the Standard C library routines are only useful for programs that wish to remain completely isolated from the details of localization. If there's any requirement at all for a specific encoding or character set (such as UTF-8 or UTF-16), they seem to be pretty much worthless as too much information is hidden. --Joe English [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- simple binary IO proposition. John Meacham
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. John Meacham
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Joe English
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Joe English
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. John Meacham
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: simple binary IO proposition. Simon Marlow
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: simple binary IO proposition. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk