Zhanyong Wan wrote: > I guess the rational behind the current design is that everything by > default should be private. However, I doubt whether it is valid: In > Haskell the let/where clause allows us to keep auxilliary functions from > polluting the top-level name space. As a result, I seldom write > "private" functions at top-level, and I think the situation might be > true for other functional programmers as well. It isn't true for me. I don't think I would ever use module hiding.
- negative export list Zhanyong Wan
- Re: negative export list Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: negative export list George Russell
- Re: negative export list Ketil Malde