There is a thread on comp.lang.functional which may be of interest.
Here is a link that might work for you.
http://www.deja.com/dnquery.xp?search=thread&svcclass=dnserver&recnum=%3c8lh
8ss$6le$[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3e%231/1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steinitz, Dominic J
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 11:12 AM
> To: haskell
> Subject: Haskell Productivity
>
>
> The Haskell website claims that
>
> "Ericsson measured an improvement factor of between 9 and 25
> in one set of experiments on telephony software".
>
> Presumably this is with Erlang not with Haskell. I have
> searched for the reference that substantiates this claim but
> I've only been able to find:
>
> http://set.gmd.de/~ap/femsys/wiger.html
>
> which talks about a productivity factor of 4
>
> and
>
> http://www.md.chalmers.se/Cs/Research/Functional/Fudgets/haske
ll-vs-ada-abstract.html
which suggests that Haskell is about 2-3 times as productive as imperative
languages.
Can someone point me at some more references? Especially the one that talks
about a productivity improvement of 9-25?
Thanks, Dominic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
21st century air travel http://www.britishairways.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
