Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> John: just to check, you do realise that (B) means
>
> a) That adding a type signature can change the dynamic semantics
> of the program. This would be the first and only occurrence of
> such behaviour.
Not so, there are already Haskell program that give a different
results with and without type signatures.
-- Lennart
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Robert Ennals
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Erik Meijer
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Rishiyur S. Nikhil
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Andreas Rossberg
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Andreas Rossberg
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism C.Reinke
