George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think Paul is being unduly modest. I found it very useful when I first learnt > Haskell. But I did already know ML, so maybe the "Gentle Introduction" would be > harder going for someone who didn't know anything about functional programming. Mind if I "me too" a bit? I had just read the SICP, and I too found that the Gentle Introduction served well as an introduction to the Haskell syntax. I think it'd be fine if the title were a bit less ambitious - it isn't really aimed at the novice, I think. It's been a while since I read it tho' -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Benjamin L. Russell
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Jan Skibinski
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Frank Atanassow
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Fritz K Ruehr
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP i r thomas
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Paul Hudak
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Shlomi Fish
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP George Russell
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Jan Skibinski
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Patrick M Doane
- RE: Learning Haskell and FP Ketil Malde
- RE: Learning Haskell and FP Karl M. Syring
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Ketil Malde
- RE: Learning Haskell and FP Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Learning Haskell and FP Karl M. Syring
- RE: Learning Haskell and FP Simon Peyton-Jones
- Writing a beginners guide to Haskell i r thomas
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP William Lee Irwin III
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP Paul Hudak
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP George Russell
- Re: Learning Haskell and FP John Peterson