Alastair David Reid wrote: | > existential types, functional dependencies, other | > experimental-but-apparently-crucial features [...] : | I do use the IO monad, IORefs (sparingly), constructor | classes, lots of libraries, the foreign function | interface (lets you call C and C++), parser generators | (happy) and parser combinators, exception handling and | concurrency (even just the lame non-preemptive version | that Hugs provides). One small point here: many libraries use experimental features in their implementation. Many efficient parsing combinator libraries for example rely on some kind of continuation monad, which often needs existential types to be implemented. /Koen. _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Application letters at the Haskell workshop: sug... S . J . Thompson
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... Ross Paterson
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... Johannes Waldmann
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell ... Ketil Malde
- RE: Application letters at the Haskell work... brk
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell ... Alastair David Reid
- RE: Application letters at the Haskell work... brk
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... Alastair David Reid
- RE: Application letters at the Haskell ... Koen Claessen
- RE: Application letters at the Haskell work... brk
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell ... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell ... Jeffrey R Lewis
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... Ashley Yakeley
- RE: Application letters at the Haskell work... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell ... Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... moran
- Re: Application letters at the Haskell work... Mark Carroll
